Current:Home > MarketsEPA's proposal to raise the cost of carbon is a powerful tool and ethics nightmare -TradeStation
EPA's proposal to raise the cost of carbon is a powerful tool and ethics nightmare
View
Date:2025-04-13 17:10:44
One of the most important tools that the federal government has for cracking down on greenhouse gas emissions is a single number: the social cost of carbon. It represents all the costs to humanity of emitting one ton of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, including everything from the cost of lost crops and flooded homes to the cost of lost wages when people can't safely work outside and, finally, the cost of climate-related deaths.
Currently, the cost is $51 per ton of carbon dioxide emitted.
NPR climate correspondent Rebecca Hersher tells Short Wave co-host Aaron Scott that the number is getting an update soon. The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed raising the cost to $190. The change could dramatically alter how the government confronts climate change.
"That's a move in the right direction," says Daniel Hemel, a law professor at New York University who studies these cost benefit analyses.
But the new, more accurate number is also an ethics nightmare.
Daniel and other experts are worried about a specific aspect of the calculation: The way the EPA thinks about human lives lost to climate change. The number newly accounts for climate-related deaths around the world, but does not factor in every death equally.
Listen to Short Wave on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and Google Podcasts.
Got questions or story ideas? Email the show at ShortWave@NPR.org.
This episode was produced by Margaret Cirino, edited by our supervising producer Rebecca Ramirez, and fact-checked by Anil Oza. Katherine Silva was the audio engineer.
veryGood! (17361)
Related
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- In some states, hundreds of thousands dropped from Medicaid
- ‘Super-Pollutant’ Emitted by 11 Chinese Chemical Plants Could Equal a Climate Catastrophe
- Will China and the US Become Climate Partners Again?
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Survivor Season 44 Crowns Its Winner
- State of the Union: Trump Glorifies Coal, Shuts Eyes to Climate Risks
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $460 Tote Bag for Just $109
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Hundreds of sea lions and dolphins are turning up dead on the Southern California coast. Experts have identified a likely culprit.
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Amazon sued for allegedly signing customers up for Prime without consent
- Our bodies respond differently to food. A new study aims to find out how
- How Federal Giveaways to Big Coal Leave Ranchers and Taxpayers Out in the Cold
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Could Exxon’s Climate Risk Disclosure Plan Derail Its Fight to Block State Probes?
- New Jersey to Rejoin East Coast Carbon Market, Virginia May Be Next
- Creating a sperm or egg from any cell? Reproduction revolution on the horizon
Recommendation
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
Kim Kardashian Reveals the Surprising Feature in a Man That's One of Her Biggest Turn Ons
How Boulder Taxed its Way to a Climate-Friendlier Future
FDA changes rules for donating blood. Some say they're still discriminatory
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Our bodies respond differently to food. A new study aims to find out how
Our bodies respond differently to food. A new study aims to find out how
A new nasal spray to reverse fentanyl and other opioid overdoses gets FDA approval