Current:Home > reviewsThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -TradeStation
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-18 02:49:40
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7358)
Related
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- AI is the buzz, the big opportunity and the risk to watch among the Davos glitterati
- Elton John achieves EGOT status with Emmy Award win
- NY midwife who gave kids homeopathic pellets instead of vaccines fined $300K for falsifying records
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Slovenia to set up temporary facilities for migrants at Croatia border, citing surge in arrivals
- Usher's Vogue cover sparks backlash: He deserves 'his own cover,' fans argue
- Usher’s Promise for His 2024 Super Bowl Halftime Performance Will Have You Saying OMG
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- A whiskey collector paid a record-setting $2.8 million for a rare bottle of Irish whiskey
Ranking
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Blazers' Deandre Ayton unable to make it to game vs. Nets due to ice
- Iran missile strikes in Pakistan show tension fueled by Israel-Hamas war spreading
- BAFTA nominations 2024: 'Oppenheimer,' 'Poor Things' lead
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- A court of appeals in Thailand hands an activist a 50-year prison term for insulting the monarchy
- Extreme cold weather causing oil spills in North Dakota; 60 reports over past week
- Woman alleges long-term heart problems caused by Panera Bread's caffeinated lemonade
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Social media influencers may seem to live charmed lives. But then comes tax time.
How fringe anti-science views infiltrated mainstream politics — and what it means in 2024
Columnist accusing Trump of sex assault faces cross-examination in a New York courtroom
Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
Green Day, Jimmy Fallon team up for surprise acoustic set in NYC subway: Video
Nevada Supreme Court panel won’t reconsider ‘Dances With Wolves’ actor Nathan Chasing Horse case
'The Last Fire Season' describes what it was like to live through Calif.'s wildfires