Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -TradeStation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-13 23:22:57
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (27)
Related
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Taxpayers could get $500 'inflation refund' checks under New York proposal: What to know
- SCDF aids police in gaining entry to cluttered Bedok flat, discovers 73
- Woody Allen and Soon
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Sabrina Carpenter reveals her own hits made it on her personal Spotify Wrapped list
- See Mariah Carey and Nick Cannon's Twins Monroe and Moroccan Gift Her Flowers Onstage
- The Sundance Film Festival unveils its lineup including Jennifer Lopez, Questlove and more
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Singaporean killed in Johor expressway crash had just paid mum a surprise visit in Genting
Ranking
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- US inflation likely edged up last month, though not enough to deter another Fed rate cut
- Video shows drone spotted in New Jersey sky as FBI says it is investigating
- Alex Jones keeps Infowars for now after judge rejects The Onion’s winning auction bid
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Drew Barrymore Addresses Criticism Over Her Touchiness With Talk Show Guests
- Stock market today: Asian shares advance, tracking rally on Wall Street
- What was 2024's best movie? From 'The Substance' to 'Conclave,' our top 10
Recommendation
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
The Voice Season 26 Crowns a New Winner
Travis Kelce Praises Taylor Swift For Making Eras Tour "Best In The World"
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Trump taps immigration hard
Fewer U.S. grandparents are taking care of grandchildren, according to new data
Worst. Tariffs. Ever. (update)