Current:Home > NewsProposal to allow local police to make arrests near Arizona border with Mexico will appear on ballot -TradeStation
Proposal to allow local police to make arrests near Arizona border with Mexico will appear on ballot
View
Date:2025-04-14 09:29:25
PHOENIX (AP) — The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that a proposal that would let local police make arrests near the state’s border with Mexico will appear on the Nov. 5 ballot for voters to decide.
That sets up the biggest push to draw local authorities into immigration enforcement since the state’s landmark 2010 law that required police to question people’s immigration status in certain situations.
The court late Tuesday afternoon rejected a challenge from Latino groups that argued the ballot measure had violated a rule in the state constitution that says legislative proposals must cover a single subject. In an order by Chief Justice Ann A. Scott Timmer, the state’s highest court concluded the measure satisfies the single-subject rule.
If approved by voters, the proposal, known as Proposition 314, would make it a state crime for people to cross the Arizona-Mexico border anywhere except a port of entry, give state and local law enforcement officers the power to arrest violators and let state judges order people to return to their home countries.
It also would make it a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison for selling fentanyl that leads to a person’s death and require some government agencies to use a federal database to verify a noncitizen’s eligibility for benefits. The proposal will go before voters in a state expected to play a crucial role in determining which party controls the White House and the U.S. Senate. Republicans hope it will focus attention on the border and dilute the political benefits Democrats seek from an abortion-rights ballot measure.
Opponents had argued the proposal dealt with the unrelated subjects of immigration enforcement, the fentanyl crisis and the regulation of public benefits. A lower court had previously rejected those arguments.
While federal law already prohibits the unauthorized entry of migrants into the U.S., proponents of the measure say it’s needed because the federal government hasn’t done enough to stop people from crossing illegally over Arizona’s porous border with Mexico. They also said some people who enter Arizona without authorization commit identity theft and take advantage of public benefits. Opponents say the proposal would lead to racial profiling, hurt Arizona’s reputation in the business world and carry huge unfunded costs for police departments that don’t typically enforce immigration law.
In early June, the Republican-controlled Legislature voted to put the measure on the ballot, bypassing Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, who had vetoed a similar measure in early March and had denounced the effort to bring the issue to voters.
This isn’t the first time Republican lawmakers in Arizona have tried to criminalize migration.
When passing its 2010 immigration bill, the Arizona Legislature considered expanding the state’s trespassing law to criminalize the presence of immigrants and impose criminal penalties. But the trespassing language was removed and replaced with a requirement that officers, while enforcing other laws, question people’s immigration status if they were believed to be in the country illegally.
The questioning requirement was ultimately upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the racial profiling concerns of critics, but courts barred enforcement of other sections of the law. Earlier this week, the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office said supporters of a proposal that would enshrine abortion rights in the state’s constitution had gathered enough signatures to put the measure on the November ballot. If approved, it would allow abortions until a fetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks, with exceptions to save the mother’s life or to protect her physical or mental health. Abortion is currently legal for the first 15 weeks of pregnancy in Arizona.
veryGood! (192)
Related
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Court Strikes Down Trump Rollback of Climate Regulations for Coal-Fired Power Plants
- Supreme Court sides with Christian postal worker who declined to work on Sundays
- Harvard, universities across U.S. react to Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Could Baltimore’s Climate Change Suit Become a Supreme Court Test Case?
- Man with weapons and Jan. 6 warrant arrested after running toward Obamas' D.C. home
- This $20 Amazon Top Is the Perfect Addition to Any Wardrobe, According to Reviewers
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- A Siege of 80 Large, Uncontained Wildfires Sweeps the Hot, Dry West
Ranking
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- In the San Joaquin Valley, Nothing is More Valuable than Water (Part 2)
- Bill McKibben Talks about his Life in Writing and Activism
- 19 Father's Day Gift Ideas for Your Husband That He'll Actually Love
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Why Tom Brady Says It’s Challenging For His Kids to Play Sports
- New York Mayor Champions Economic Justice in Sustainability Plan
- Here's How Tom Brady Intercepts the Noise and Rumors Surrounding His Life
Recommendation
Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
Jennifer Hudson Celebrates Son David's Middle School Graduation
In the San Joaquin Valley, Nothing is More Valuable than Water (Part 1)
Kim Cattrall Talked About Moving On Before Confirming She'll Appear on And Just Like That...
Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
Country singer Kelsea Ballerini hit in the face with bracelet while performing
Cameron Boyce Honored by Descendants Co-Stars at Benefit Almost 4 Years After His Death
Florida bill allowing radioactive roads made of potentially cancer-causing mining waste signed by DeSantis